Name: Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights: Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico (en Inglés)
Price: 609.25 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Narváez Medécigo, Alfredo
ISBN: 9783319387185

portada Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights: Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Alfredo Narváez Medécigo

Editorial

Springer

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

262

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

23.4 x 15.6 x 1.5 cm

Peso

0.39 kg.

ISBN13

9783319387185

Categorías

Obras de consulta
Teoría del derecho
Derecho internacional
Derecho constitucional

Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights: Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico (en Inglés)

Alfredo Narváez Medécigo (Autor) · Springer · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

S/ 609,25

S/ 1.015,42

Ahorras: S/ 406,17

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 15 de Julio y el Miércoles 24 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights: Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico (en Inglés)"

This book, which originated from the broadly held view that there is a lack of Rule-of-law in Mexico, and from the emphasis of traditional academia on cultural elements as the main explanation, explores the question of whether there is any relationship between the system of constitutional review ― and thus the 'law' as such ― and the level of Rule-of-law in a given state. To do so, it elaborates a theoretical model for achieving Rule-of-law and compares it to the constitutional review systems of the United States, the Federal Republic of Germany, and Mexico. The study concludes that the two former states correspond to the model, while the latter does not. This is fundamentally due to the role each legal system assigns to ordinary jurisdiction in carrying out constitutional review. Whereas the US and Germany have fostered the policy that constitutional review regarding the enforcement of basic rights is the responsibility of ordinary courts, Mexico has relied too heavily on the specialized constitutional jurisdiction.