Name: Rapid Runway Repair: An Optimization for Minimum Operating Strip Selection (en Inglés)
Price: 256.04 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Duncan, David
ISBN: 9781288369355

portada Rapid Runway Repair: An Optimization for Minimum Operating Strip Selection (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

David Duncan

Editorial

Biblioscholar

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

128

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.7 cm

Peso

0.24 kg.

ISBN13

9781288369355

Categorías

Educación

Rapid Runway Repair: An Optimization for Minimum Operating Strip Selection (en Inglés)

David Duncan (Autor) · Biblioscholar · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

S/ 256,04

S/ 512,07

Ahorras: S/ 256,04

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 22 de Julio y el Miércoles 31 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Rapid Runway Repair: An Optimization for Minimum Operating Strip Selection (en Inglés)"

Minimum Operating Strip (MOS) selection determines the exact placement of the MOS on the damaged runway, and therefore, the amount of munitions that need to be neutralized and the amount of damage that will need to be repaired. MOS selection, in essence, is the key determinant of the time required to attain an operational takeoff and recovery surface. Since the MOS selection stage determines the events and scope of work for all of the Rapid Runway Repair (RRR) stages that follow, it could be argued that this is the most important stage in the entire RRR process. The primary purpose of this research was to evaluate the application of a decision analysis methodology for the selection of a MOS during the RRR process. The secondary purpose was to determine the effect of additional considerations on both the MOS selected and the repair time. MOSs selected utilizing the outlined methodology were compared to a MOS selected using the current USAF method. Results showed that additional considerations have an impact on both MOS selection and time to repair. Results also showed that the outlined methodology selected a MOS with a shorter repair time, despite additional damage, than the MOS selected using the current USAF method.