Name: New York Times Co. V. Sullivan Forty Years Later: Retrospective, Perspective, Prospective: A Special Issue of Communication Law and Policy (en Inglés)
Price: 790.60 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Hopkins, W. Wat
ISBN: 9781138412088

portada New York Times Co. V. Sullivan Forty Years Later: Retrospective, Perspective, Prospective: A Special Issue of Communication Law and Policy (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Routledge

Autor

Hopkins, W. Wat

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

212

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781138412088

Categorías

Estudios de comunicación
Estudios sobre medios

New York Times Co. V. Sullivan Forty Years Later: Retrospective, Perspective, Prospective: A Special Issue of Communication Law and Policy (en Inglés)

Hopkins, W. Wat (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Dura

Libro Físico

S/ 790,60

S/ 1.581,20

Ahorras: S/ 790,60

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Reino Unido (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 19 de Julio y el Lunes 05 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "New York Times Co. V. Sullivan Forty Years Later: Retrospective, Perspective, Prospective: A Special Issue of Communication Law and Policy (en Inglés)"

The need to protect free speech on matters of governing importance--more than any other element of government--is the defining factor of a free society. Nowhere in the law is that prospect more clearly explained than in the opinion in Times v. Sullivan. This special issue provides an example of the breadth and scope of Times v. Sullivan and the ways in which the case continues to impact the jurisprudence of free expression. It is introduced by two essays designed to provide an overview of the case, providing insights into the origins of the dispute the Court was called upon to settle. The next four articles are testimony to breadth the opinion in this case, particularly dealing with aspects not often considered. Combined, they all demonstrate the lasting significance of what may be the most important free expression case the Court has delivered.