Name: Naturalism and our Knowledge of Reality: Testing Religious Truth-Claims (Routledge new Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies) (en Inglés)
Price: 199.54 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: R. Scott Smith
ISBN: 9781032243078

portada Naturalism and our Knowledge of Reality: Testing Religious Truth-Claims (Routledge new Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Routledge

Autor

R. Scott Smith

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

254

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781032243078

N° edición

Naturalism and our Knowledge of Reality: Testing Religious Truth-Claims (Routledge new Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies) (en Inglés)

R. Scott Smith (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Blanda

Libro Físico

S/ 199,54

S/ 399,08

Ahorras: S/ 199,54

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Reino Unido (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 17 de Julio y el Jueves 01 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Naturalism and our Knowledge of Reality: Testing Religious Truth-Claims (Routledge new Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies) (en Inglés)"

Philosophical naturalism is taken to be the preferred and reigning epistemology and metaphysics that underwrites many ideas and knowledge claims. But what if we cannot know reality on that basis? What if the institution of science is threatened by its reliance on naturalism? R. Scott Smith argues in a fresh way that we cannot know reality on the basis of naturalism. Moreover, the "fact-value" split has failed to serve our interests of wanting to know reality. The author provocatively argues that since we can know reality, it must be due to a non-naturalistic ontology, best explained by the fact that human knowers are made and designed by God. The book offers fresh implications for the testing of religious truth-claims, science, ethics, education, and public policy. Consequently, naturalism and the fact-value split are shown to be false, and Christian theism is shown to be true.