Compartir
Measuring the Global Burden of Disease: Philosophical Dimensions (Population Level Bioethics Series) (en Inglés)
Nir Eyal
(Ilustrado por)
·
Samia A. Hurst
(Ilustrado por)
·
Christopher J. L. Murray
(Ilustrado por)
·
Oxford University Press, USA
· Tapa Dura
Measuring the Global Burden of Disease: Philosophical Dimensions (Population Level Bioethics Series) (en Inglés) - Eyal, Nir ; Hurst, Samia A. ; Murray, Christopher J. L.
S/ 613,60
S/ 1.022,67
Ahorras: S/ 409,07
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Estados Unidos
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Martes 16 de Julio y el
Jueves 25 de Julio.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "Measuring the Global Burden of Disease: Philosophical Dimensions (Population Level Bioethics Series) (en Inglés)"
The Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) is one of the largest-scale research collaborations in global health, distilling a wide range of health information to provide estimates and projections for more than 350 diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 195 countries. Its results are a critical tool informing researchers, policy-makers, and others working to promote health around the globe. A study like the GBD is, of course, extremely complex from an empirical perspective. But it also raises a large number of complex ethical and philosophical questions that have been explored in a series of collaborations over the past twenty years among epidemiologists, philosophers, economists, and policy scholars. The essays in this volume address issues of current and urgent concern to the GBD and other epidemiological studies, including rival understandings of causation, the aggregation of complex health data, temporal discounting, age-weighting, and the valuation of health states. The volume concludes with a set of chapters discussing how epidemiological data should and should not be used. Better appreciating the philosophical dimensions of a study like the GBD can make possible a more sophisticated interpretation of its results, and it can improve epidemiological studies in the future, so that they are better suited to produce results that can help us to improve global health.
