Compartir
Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China (en Inglés)
Turan Kayaoglu; Turan Kayaoğ Lu; Turan Kayao Lu (Autor)
·
Cambridge University Press
· Tapa Dura
Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China (en Inglés) - Turan Kayaoglu; Turan Kayaoğ Lu; Turan Kayao Lu
S/ 477,87
S/ 955,74
Ahorras: S/ 477,87
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: España
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Viernes 02 de Agosto y el
Martes 13 de Agosto.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China (en Inglés)"
Legal Imperialism examines the important role of nineteenth-century Western extraterritorial courts in non-Western states. These courts, created as a separate legal system for Western expatriates living in Asian and Islamic coutries, developed from the British imperial model, which was founded on ideals of legal positivism. Based on a cross-cultural comparison of the emergence, function, and abolition of these court systems in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China, Turan Kayaoglu elaborates a theory of extraterritoriality, comparing the nineteenth-century British example with the post-World War II American legal imperialism. He also provides an explanation for the end of imperial extraterritoriality, arguing that the Western decision to abolish their separate legal systems stemmed from changes in non-Western territories, including Meiji legal reforms, Republican Turkey's legal transformation under Ataturk, and the Guomindang's legal reorganization in China. Ultimately, his research provides an innovative basis for understanding the assertion of legal authority by Western powers on foreign soil and the influence of such assertion on ideas about sovereignty.
